← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./17737/2024bail granted

Raju Kumar @ Raju Das v. The State Of Bihar

2024-03-14Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar Verma3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17737 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-580 Year-2023 Thana- MOTIHARI MUFASIL District- East Champaran ====================================================== Raju Kumar @ Raju Das Son of Late Hajari Das @ Hajari Das, R/O villageJamla, P.S.-Muffasil Motihari, Distt.-East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rahul Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Manoj Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 14-03-2024 Heard Mr. Rahul Singh, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Manoj Kumar, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Muffasil PS Case No. 580 of 2023, FIR dated 16.08.2023, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 461 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code.

3.

According to prosecution case, the cyber cafe of the informant was robbed and articles worth of Rs. 3,00,000/- (Rupees three lakhs) and cash of Rs. 5,000/- (Rupees five thousand) were stolen. It is further alleged that a few days prior to the alleged occurrence, two boys namely Manu Kumar and Raju Das had threatened the informant that would rob the property in question. 4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17737 of 2024(2) dt.14-03-2024 2/3 petitioner has clean antecedent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case merely on the basis of suspicion. He further submits that upon perusal of the FIR, it appears that the date of occurrence as alleged in the FIR is 13.08.2022, but the present FIR is instituted on 16.08.2022, afterthought, only to falsely implicate the petitioner and no cogent material has come during investigation that suggests that involvement of the petitioner in the present occurrence.

5.

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State on the other hand has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner, but fairly submits that from bare perusal of the FIR, it appears that the present FIR is instituted against the petitioner merely on the basis of suspicion.

6.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances and the fact that the petitioner has clean antecedent and his name has transpired merely on the basis of suspicion, let the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the trial Court, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the order, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Motihari, East Champaran, where the case is pending in connection with Muffasil PS Case No. 580 of 2023, subject to the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17737 of 2024(2) dt.14-03-2024 3/3 conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. and also the following conditions:

(i). Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the trial Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the trial Court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the trial Court.

(ii). If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(iii). And further condition that the trial Court shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case, at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the trial Court shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Shahnawaz/- U T