← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/6835/2016dismissed

Jubrail Ansari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2023-10-12Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6835 of 2016 ====================================================== Jubrail Ansari Son of late Tajammul Hussain Resident of Village -Sikrahta Kala, PS Sikrahta, Kala, PS Sikrahta Kal, District Bhojpurat Arrah. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

The Secretary, Personnel and Administration Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Principal Secretary of Finance Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 4.

The Superintending Engineer, N.H. Circle, Bhojpur Circle, District Bhojpur Arrah, 5.

The Executive Engineer, Shahabad Road Division, Arrah. 6.

The Executive Engineer, road Construction Bhojpur Arrah. 7.

The Deputy Secretary of the Govt. Road Construction Department Govt of Bihar, Patna.

8.

The Assistant Engineer, Road Sub Division Road Constructio Department Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Md. Anisur Rahman, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Anil Kumar, GP-23 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 12-10-2023 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs:- "1. I. For issuance of appropriate writ/order or direction commanding the Respondents to regularize the service of the petitioner from the date on which the person's Junior to him have been taken in regular service and also to pay the arrears of salary, promotion as A.C.P. and

Patna High Court CWJC No.6835 of 2016(2) dt.12-10-2023 2/2 other benefit to the petitioner as a regular employee.

B. For issuance of appropriate writ/order or direction commanding the Respondents to allow the petitioner all the retirement benefits such as pension, Gratuity, G.P.F., Leave Encashment etc. to the petitioner from the date of his retirement as a Regular employee."

2.

At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law, for redressal of the aforesaid grievances. Liberty, so sought, is granted.

3.

The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) S.Sb/- U