← Library
Patna High CourtCR. APP (SJ)/782/2020withdrawn

Ajit Kumar Jha @ Ajit Kumar Vats v. The State Of Bihar

2024-07-31Mr. Justice Chandra Shekhar Jha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.782 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-207 Year-1998 Thana- AMARPUR District- Banka ====================================================== Ajit Kumar Jha @ Ajit Kumar Vats, son of Late Alakh Narayan Jha, Resident of Village - Surihari, P.S.- Amarpur, District Banka. ... ... Appellant

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Bipin @ Lalan Kumar Jha Son of Anil Kumar Jha Resident of Village - Surihari, P.S.- Amarpur, District Banka.

3.

Chit Ranjan Kumar Jha Son of Anil Kumar Jha Resident of Village - Surihari, P.S.- Amarpur, District Banka.

4.

Palan Kumar Jha Son of Anil Kumar Jha Resident of Village - Surihari, P.S.- Amarpur, District Banka.

5.

Ranjan @ Ghanshyam Jha Son of Anil Kumar Jha Resident of Village - Surihari, P.S.- Amarpur, District Banka.

6.

Chandan Kumar Jha Son of Anil Kumar Jha Resident of Village - Surihari, P.S.- Amarpur, District Banka.

... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr.Prabhakar Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Abhay Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER 31-07-2024 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties.

2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant seeks permission to withdraw the present appeal, which is against acquittal, as to file the same before Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court, for the reason that respondent nos. 2 to 6 have been acquitted from the charges levelled against them under Section 307 of I.P.C., for which

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.782 of 2020(3) dt.31-07-2024 2/2 sentence may go upto life imprisonment.

3. Request allowed.

4. Accordingly, the present appeal stands disposed of as withdrawn with direction to the office that the certified copy of impugned judgment and Vakalatnama be returned in original to the learned counsel appearing for the appellant, as to enable him to file the appeal before Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court, as aforesaid.

(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.) Rajeev/- U T