Dr. C. S. Tomar @ Chatrasal Singh Tomar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14727 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-288 Year-2023 Thana- SIWAN MUFFASIL District- Siwan ====================================================== Dr. C. S. Tomar @ Chatrasal Singh Tomar S/o- Gorelal Tomar VillageLaxman Vihar Phase II Gurgaon PS- Dist- Gurgaon, Haryana ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajnish Chandra For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Chandra Bhushan Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 24-06-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Muffasil (Mahadeva) P.S. Case No. 288 of 2023 dated 29.05.2023 registered for the offences punishable u/s 302 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, the informant's brother was shot dead by unknown miscreants.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner is not named in the FIR. The name of the petitioner has sprung up during the course of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14727 of 2025(3) dt.24-06-2025 2/2 investigation. The petitioner is a resident of Hariyana and the occurrence took place in Siwan, Bihar. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has one criminal antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 16.06.2024.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner. As per para 66 of the case diary, the petitioner was arrested and he himself confessed his guilt that he killed the deceased and ran away from there and the weapon used in the same crime was recovered from his house. It is further submitted that the CDR also supports the prosecution case.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the heinous nature of allegation against the petitioner, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

7. The application stands rejected.

8. Learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same at the earliest.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) guddukr/- U T