Vikash Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13400 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-422 Year-2022 Thana- FATUA District- Patna ====================================================== VIKASH KUMAR Son of Late Yogendra Prasad @ Late Bagru Yadav R/O Nohta, Mirzapur Nohta, P.S.- Fatua, District - Patna ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Kritu Verma, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Upendra Kumar, APP.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 22-06-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 363, 365, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Allegedly, petitioner, along with other accused persons, came at the house of the informant and took his son away with them. It is suspected that the informant's son was killed by the accused persons, as they had threatened his son to kill him. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. No such occurrence as alleged ever took place. He has been falsely implicated in this case due to ulterior motive. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13400 of 2023(3) dt.22-06-2023 2/2 omnibus in nature. He been made accused in the present case merely because he took the informant's son away with him to attend a party organised at Mokama. Petitioner has three criminal antecedents as mentioned in para-3 of this application. Per contra, learned APP for the State vehemently opposing the bail petition submitted that the informant's son is still traceless. He further submitted that allegation levelled against the petitioner is serious in nature, hence he does not deserve anticipatory bail.
Considering the facts and circumstances of case, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The prayer for bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) divyanshi/- U T