Shekh Jahangir And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.9667 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -166 Year- 2017 Thana -SIKTA DistrictWESTCHAMPARAN(BETTIAH) ======================================================

1. Shekh Jahangir, son of Sheikh Shakil,

2. Sheikh Wakil, son of late Fajle Haque,

3. Fajil Ahmad @ Sheikh Fajil, son of late Fajle Haque,

4. Shekh Badul, son of late Fajle Haque,

5. Shekh Shakil, son of late Fajle Haque, all are resident of villageLalparsa, Police Station- Sikta, District- West Champaran. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arbind Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Smt Sangeeta Sharma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 2/ 21-02-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

Petitioners apprehend their arrest in Sikta P.S. Case No.166 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 341, 323, 354-B, 379, 506/34 Indian Penal Code.

Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that there is specific allegation in the written report against Sheikh Mojammil. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners. Specific allegation against Sheikh Mojammil is of assaulting the informant with iron rod on her hand and stomach on account of which she sustained injuries.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.9667 of 2018 (2) dt.21-02-2018 2/2 In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioners for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioners, named above, within six weeks from today in connection with Sikta P.S. Case No.166 of 2017, they shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah, West Champaran, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P. C.

with further conditions: (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and their absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be liable to cancel their bail bonds and (3) if petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners.

(Sanjay Priya, J) JA/- U T