Patna High CourtCR. MISC./18768/2024dismissed

Sampurnanand Dev v. The State Of Bihar

2024-12-20Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18768 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-915 Year-2023 Thana- RUPASPUR District- Patna ====================================================== Sampurnanand Dev Son of Tribhuwan Singh Resident of vill.-Rajiv Nagar, Road No. 24, P.S.-Rajiv Nagar, Distt.-Patna. Permanent address vill.- Chhaprapur, P.S.-Narayanpur, Distt.-Bhojpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar Bihar 2.

Kanchan Devi Wife Of Late Pawan Poddar Village- Balluhari, Krishnapuri, Ps- Nagar, Dist- Khagaria ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ravi Ranjan Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ram Sumiran Rai Mr. Bajrangi Lal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 20-12-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for the State and the learned counsel for the informant; Sri Bajrangi Lal.

2. The petitioners seek bail in connection with Rupaspur P.S. Case No. 915 of 2023 registered for the offence under Section 306/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The petitioner had taken Rs. 14,50,000/- from the deceased for getting him contract work. The deceased started demanding his money back when no contract was awarded to him. The deceased was called to Patna and was confined in a room by petitioner, Kartik Kumar and Jivneshwar Kumar. The deceased called his wife and narrated to her the entire story and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18768 of 2024(6) dt.20-12-2024 2/2 further told his wife that he has taken poison and thereafter he died.

4. The petitioner is in jail 13.11.2023. It is because of the petitioner that the deceased committed suicide.

5. The learned counsel for the informant has submitted that the prosecution is ready to lead the evidence as charges have been framed.

6. In these circumstances, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Accordingly, this application is dismissed.

8. The Court below is directed to expedite the trial of the petitioner and conclude the same at the earliest.

9. If the trial is delayed by the prosecution, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) Shishir/- U T