Bipin Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.168 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -159 Year- 2016 Thana -KURSELA District- KATIHAR ====================================================== Bipin Yadav, Son of Harilal Yadav, Resident of Village-Madheli Bandh Tola, Jarlahi Diyara, P.S.- Barari, District-Katihar. .... .... Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Respondent ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant/s : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Jha, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Binay Krishna, SPP. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 16-01-2018 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
This is an appeal under Section 14 (2) (A) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 against the refusal of prayer for bail by the learned Additional Sessions Judge III-cum-cum-Special Judge, Katihar, in connection with Kuresela Police Station Case No.159 of 2016 corresponding to G.R.No.4343 of 2016 (S.O.S) registered under Sections 364,34 of the Indian Penal Code later on Sections 366,302,201,341 of the Indian Penal Code was added and Section 3(2) (v) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.
The FIR of the occurrence of kidnapping and murder is against unknown. After four months of the occurrence, the informant raised suspicion against the appellant.
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.168 of 2018 (2) dt.16-01-2018 Considering the aforesaid material, let the appellant, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court-below where the case is pending in connection with Kuresela Police Station Case No.159 of 2016 corresponding to G.R.No.4343 of 2016 (S.O.S.), with condition that the appellant shall fully cooperate with the investigation/trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the appellant. Accordingly, the appeal stands allowed.
(Birendra Kumar, J) Nitesh/- U T