Krishna Kumar Sharma v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.6744 of 2015 Arising out of PS.Case No. -136 Year- 2014 Thana -SISWAN District- SIWAN ======================================================
1. Vijay Sharma @ Vijay Kishore Sharma, Son of Late Mosafir Sharma, Resident of Village Ramgarh, P.S. Siswan, District Siwan.
2. Ratnesh Sharma, Son of Chhote Lal Sharma, Resident of Village Rukundipur, P.S. Doronda, District Siwan.
3. Vansewan Sharma, Son of Late Mahatam Sharma, Resident of Village Panjwar, P.S. Raghunathpur, District Siwan.
.... .... Petitioners
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== with Criminal Miscellaneous No.15104 of 2015 Arising out of PS.Case No. -136 Year- 2014 Thana -SISWAN District- SIWAN ====================================================== Krishna Kumar Sharma, Son of Late Mosafir Sharma, Resident of Village Ramgarh, Police Station Siswan, District Siwan. .... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
(In Cr.Misc. No.6744 of 2015) For the Petitioners :
Shri Raghav Prasad, Advocate For the State :
Shri Dinesh Singh, APP (In Cr.Misc. No.15104 of 2015) For the Petitioner :
Shri Raghav Prasad, Advocate For the State :
Shri Raj Ballabh Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE DHARNIDHAR JHA ORAL ORDER 16-07-2015 Heard the parties.
Regard being had to the allegations and considering that petitioner, namely, Krishna Kumar Sharma of Cr. Misc. No. 15104 of 2015 bears quite some substantial criminal antecedents, the Court is not inclined to act upon the submission that he had undergone bye-pass surgery. His prayer
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6744 of 2015 (5) dt.16-07-2015 2 / 2 for anticipatory bail is dismissed.
As regards the three petitioners of other petition, let the court below on their surrender examine the individual allegation appearing against them and, if need be, seek information from the police about their antecedents and then finally decide the prayer for bail. Till the papers and documents are received by the court below from the police, the three petitioners may be admitted to bail provisionally till final adjudication of the prayer for bail of the three petitioners. With the above direction to the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siwan in connection with Siswan (Chainpur O.P.) P.S. Case No. 136 of 2014, the two petitions stand disposed of in the above terms.
(Dharnidhar Jha, J.) Sanjay/- U T