Patna High CourtCR. MISC./19072/2024bail granted

Lavkush Kumar @ Lavkush Kumar Sah v. The State Of Bihar

2024-03-15Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19072 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-510 Year-2017 Thana- RUNISAIDPUR District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== LAVKUSH KUMAR @ LAVKUSH KUMAR SAH SON OF LATE KAPILDEO SAH R/O-JHAKHRA, P.S.-PIPRA KOTHI, DISTT.-EAST CHAMPARAN (MOTIHARI) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Niranjan Parihar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms.Rita Verma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 15-03-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Runnisaidpur P.S. case No. 510 of 2017 instituted for the offences under Sections 419, 420, 467, 471, 401/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Prosecution case, in short, is that police on the basis of information that accused persons are committing cheating with the customers in the Punjab National Bank, apprehended one person who disclosed his name as Rambhu Kumar. On search, deposit slip and mobile phone was recovered from him.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19072 of 2024(2) dt.15-03-2024 2/2 Learned counsel further submitted that name of the petitioner was disclosed by the co-accused Rambhu Kumar who has inimical terms with the petitioner. No incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Charge-sheet has been submitted in this case. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 27.11.2023 and has one criminal antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, as also the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Runnisaidpur P.S. case No. 510 of 2017.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Alok Verma/- U