Sipahi Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.21138 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -22 Year- 2013 Thana -KAHAIYA District- MUZAFFARPUR ====================================================== Sipahi Mahto, Son of Darshan Mahto, Resident of Village- Saghanpura, Police Station- Kathaiya, District- Muzaffarpur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Ram Anurag Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 02-05-2018 Heard.

Petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sessions Trial No.16 of 2017, arising out of Kathaiya P.S. Case No.22 of 2013, registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 379, 302 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of the Additional Sessions Judge-VII, Muzaffarpur.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, earlier, the prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected by this Court vide order dated 23.03.2017 passed in Criminal Misc.No.27638 of 2016 on merit. Petitioner is in custody since 02.04.2016. Further submission is that in course of investigation, it has come that on the alleged date of the occurrence, the petitioner was on duty at Delhi, as detailed in paragraphs 72 and 73 of the supplementary

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.21138 of 2018 (2) dt.02-05-2018 2/2 case diary.

Since the prayer for bail of the petitioner has already been rejected by this Court on merit vide order dated 23.03.2017 passed in Criminal Misc. No.27638 of 2016, I find no reason to reconsider the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is again rejected. (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) AnilKrSinha/- U