← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./23880/2021rejected

Awadhesh Ram @ Awadhesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2022-04-07Mr. Justice Arvind Srivastava2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23880 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-114 Year-2020 Thana- CHANAN District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== AWADHESH RAM @ AWADHESH KUMAR SON OF YADUNANDAN RAM R/O VILLAGEKUNDAR, P.S.- CHANAN, DISTRICTLAKHISARAI.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

MAMTA DEVI WIFE OF AWADHESH RAM R/O VILLAGE- KUNDAR, P.S.- CHANAN, DISTRICT- LAKHISARAI.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Manoj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Syed Mojibur Rahman ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 07-04-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Chanan P.S. Case No. 114 of 2020 registered under Sections 448/498A/341/323/308/34 of the I.P.C. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case due to family dispute. Further he submits that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner. Learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State opposed the prayer of the petitioner by contending that petitioner is husband of the informant. He is named in the first

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23880 of 2021(5) dt.07-04-2022 2/2 information report. Further he submits that from perusal of first informant report, it is apparent that there is direct allegation of assault by means of lathi and danda against the petitioner. Injury also corroborates the allegation as alleged in the first information report. Hence, this is not a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail.

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and nature of the allegation, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, prayer of the petitioner is rejected.

shailendra/- (Arvind Srivastava, J) U T