Kamleshwar Giri v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3976 of 2022 ====================================================== 1.

Kamleshwar Giri Son of Late Parmeshwar Giri Resident of Mohallah - Mirzatoli, Utarwari Pokhara Chhauni, Bettiah, Ward no. - 6, At and P.O. and P.S. - Bettiah, District- West Champaran.

2.

Abhay Kumar Srivastava Son of Late Shivnandan Prasad Resident of Mohallah - Raj Colony, Ward no. - 25, Ganj no. - 2, Near Jangi Masjid, At and P.o. and P.S. - Bettiah, District- West Champaran. 3.

Anil Kumar Deo Son of Late Umashankar Prasad Srivastava Resident of Mohallah - Mirzatola, Chhauni, Bettiah, Ward no. - 4, At and P.O and P.S. - Bettiah, District- West Champaran.

4.

Devanand Mishra Son of Late Paras Nath Mishra Resident of Mohallah - Mirzatola, Utarwari Pokhara Chhauni, Bettiah, At and P.O. and P.S. - Bettiah, District- West Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar Through Principal Secretary, Urban Development and Hosing Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The District Magistrate - cum- Collector, Bettiah, West Champaran. 3.

The Additional Collector, Bettiah, West Champaran. 4.

The Sub Divisional Officer, Bettiah, West Champaran. 5.

The Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Bettiah, West Champaran. 6.

The Municipal Corporation, Bettiah, West Champaran, through its Municipal Commissioner.

7.

The Municipal Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Bettiah, West Champaran.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Mahesh Narayan Parbat, Sr. Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Priyadarshi Matri Sharan, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 18-03-2024 As pointed out by the office, the defects, as pointed out by the office, should be removed in a week.

2. Heard the parties.

3. Learned Senior Counsel submits that now the

Patna High Court CWJC No.3976 of 2022(2) dt.18-03-2024 2/2 municipality has already made construction in its own land and as such, the writ petition has become infructuous.

4. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. (Rajiv Roy, J) Jagdish/- U