Smt. Rinku Devi @ Rinku Kumari @ Pinky Yadav @ Pinku Yadav v. The Union Of India, Through Its Deputy Director , Directorate Of Enforcement

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 18570 of 2014 Arising out of P.S. Case No. -1 Year- 2013 Thana -PATNA COMPLAINT CASE District- PATNA ======================================================== Smt. Rinku Devi @ Rinku Kumari @ Pinky Yadav @ Pinku Yadav, Wife of Sri Rit Lal Rai @ Rit Lal Yadav @ Rit Lal Roy @ Rit Lal Prasad Singh, Resident of Kothwan, P.S.-Khagaul, District-Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The Union of India, through its Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, (prevention of Money Laundering Act), .... .... Opposite Party/s with ======================================================== Criminal Miscellaneous No. 13456 of 2014 Arising out of P.S. Case No. -1 Year- 2013 Thana -PATNA COMPLAINT CASE District- PATNA ======================================================== Sri Ritlal Rai @ Ritlal Yadav @ Ritlal Roy @ Ritlal Pd. Singh Son of Shri Ramashish Rai Resident of Kothwan, P.S- Khagaul, DistrictPatna, Bihar , Pin- 801105 ( At Present Lodged I N Adarsh Kandriya Kara, Beur) .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The Union of India through its Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement (Prevention of Money Laundering Act), Govt of India, BSFC. Building, 4th Floor, Frazer Road, Patna- 800001. .... .... Opposite Party/s ======================================================== Appearance :

(In Cr.Misc. No. 18570 of 2014) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ghanshyam Tiwary, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. N.A. Shamsi, ASG. (In Cr.Misc. No. 13456 of 2014) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ghanshyam Tiwary, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. N.A. Shamsi, ASG. ======================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 19-03-2015 The Petitioners seek quashing of the order dated 22.03.2014 passed by the Sessions Judge-cum-Special

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18570 of 2014 dt.19-03-2015 Judge, Patna in Special Trial (PML Act) No. 1 of 2013. Considering that the Petitioners seek quashing on disputed questions of fact which can not be gone into at this stage, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter. The application is dismissed.

The Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same without granting unnecessary adjournment to any party for which reason it shall send a list of the witnesses fixing specific dates for production of the witnesses along with a copy of this order, to the Sr. Superintendent of Police, Patna, and the Sr.

Superintendent of Police, Patna is directed to ensure production of the witnesses on the date so fixed by the Trial Court so that there is no further delay in trial. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.) U T