Santosh Prasad @ Sethi @ Santosh Kumar Prasad @ Sethi Prasad @ Santosh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13515 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-419 Year-2025 Thana- RIVILGANJ District- Saran ====================================================== Santosh Prasad @ Sethi @ Santosh Kumar Prasad @ Sethi Prasad @ Santosh S/o- Tarkeshwar Prasad @ Tarkeshwar Sah R/o Village- Nayka Barka Baiju Tola P.S- Revilganj District- Saran ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ashad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Vinod Shanker Modi, A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 10-03-2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of two cases under the Excise Act and allegation is of recovery of 202.328 litres of liquor from a place near the house of the petitioner, 37.440 litres of liquor from an E-rickshaw and 60 litres of liquor from a Scooty.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was not arrested from the spot, as such, nothing was recovered from his conscious possession. It is further submitted that petitioner is not the owner of any of the seized vehicles and
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13515 of 2026(2) dt.10-03-2026 2/3 even the alleged recovery of 202.328 litres of liquor is from a place which does not belong to the petitioner but then is adjacent to his house and, thus, petitioner came to be implicated based on the secret information which is the easiest way to implicate someone. It is next submitted that once an accused is implicated in a case relating to excise the police start implicating mechanically either at the instance of the Chawkidar, local person, secret information or confessional statement without holding a proper investigation of the case.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, let the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on provisional anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Revilganj P.S. Case No. 419 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C./482(2) of the B.N.S.S.
7. It is made clear that thereafter the learned trial
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13515 of 2026(2) dt.10-03-2026 3/3 court shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of more than two cases, it would be presumed that petitioner had concealed his antecedent before this Court at para 3 of the anticipatory bail application in that event the provisional anticipatory bail order shall not be confirmed but if it is found on verification that petitioner has antecedent of only two cases in that event the provisional anticipatory bail order shall be confirmed forthwith. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T