Jitendra @ Dablu Paswan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.24821 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -30 Year- 2017 Thana -KOCHAS District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ======================================================
1. Jitendra @ Dablu Paswan, son of Yamuna Paswan, resident of VillageGogahara, P.s.- Kargahar (Siddi O.P.), District- Rohtas. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sada Nand Roy For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Shyameshwar Dayal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 01-06-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. representing the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Kochas P.S. Case No. 30 of 2017 registered for the offence punishable under Section 414 of the Indian Penal Code.
Allegedly, the petitioner is pillion rider of the seized motorcycle and on demand he could not show a chit of paper regarding ownership of the alleged motorcycle. Submission is of false implication and that petitioner has got no concern with the alleged motorcycle. He is a man of clean antecedent. He is suffering in custody since 04.03.2017, deserves sympathetic consideration.
The learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer of bail.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.24821 of 2017 (2) dt.01-06-2017 2/2 In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned ACJM-I, Sasaram, Distt. Rohtas in connection with Kochas P.S. Case No. 30 of 2017 subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.
(S. Kumar, J) sushma/- U T