Shiv Balak Chouhan v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17494 of 2016 ====================================================== Shiv Balak Chouhan s/o late jaidev chouhan village-Badi Khurd, p.s.- Barun, and District- Aurangabad ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State Of Bihar 2.
The state of Bihar through the principal secretary, Department of Land reforms and revenue, Govt. o 3.
The District Magistrate, Aurangabad.
4.
The Additional Collector Cum Arbitrator, Aurangabad 5.
The Deputy Collector Land Reform , cum the competent authority, Aurangabad 6.
The Chief General Manager National High Way II, Aurangabad. 7.
The Project Director, P.I.U., N.H.A.I., Varanasi ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Anirudh Kumar Verma, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Md.Khurshid Alam-Aag12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 04-08-2025 Heard Mr. Anirudh Kumar Verma, learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.
2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief/s:
(i) for quashing the awarded dated 12.3.2016 passed under "Right to Fair compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 which is amended award dated 7.7.2014 under section 3G of the National
Patna High Court CWJC No.17494 of 2016(2) dt.04-08-2025 2/2 Highway Act, 1956 under Gazette notification dated 8.12.2010 without following mandatory requirements under section 24(2) of the RFCTLARR Act, 2013.
3. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner/legal heirs he shall be approaching the competent authority for redressal of the grievance.
4. Learned State counsel has no objection.
5. If the petition is preferred in next four weeks, the competent authority keep in mind that the writ petition was pending before this Court for nine years while dealing with the limitation petition and see to it that the same is disposed of at an earliest. submits that he shall be approaching the competent authority for redressal of the grievance.
6. Granting said liberty, the writ petition is disposed of.
(Rajiv Roy, J) Ravi/- U