← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/7311/2021disposed

Smt Meena Devi v. The State Bank Of India

2022-01-18The Chief Justice -,Mr. Justice S. Kumar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7311 of 2021 ====================================================== Smt. Meena Devi W/o Late Anil Kumar R/o Mohalla- Alibagh, Devi Sthan, Manpur, P.S.- Muffassil, District- Gaya, Bihar. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Bank of India through its Chairman, at State Bank Bhawan, Madam Kama Road, Mumbai- 400021.

2.

The Assistant General Manager, State Bank of India, Retail Assets Centralized Processing Centre, Patna.

3.

The Branch Manager, State Bank of India, Near Gaya Court Main Branch, Patna, P.S. Kotwali Civil Line, District- Gaya. 4.

The S.B.I. Life Insurance Company Limited, Western Express Highway Junction, Andheri (E), Mumbai- 400069.

5.

SBI Life Insurance Co. Ltd., A.P. Colony, Near Asha Singh More, P.S.- Rampur, Dist- Gaya.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Praveen Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Sanjiv Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) (The proceedings of the Court are being conducted by Hon'ble the Chief Justice/Hon'ble Judges through Video Conferencing from their residential offices/residences. Also the Advocates and the Staffs joined the proceedings through Video Conferencing from their residences/offices.) Date : 18-01-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s):-

Patna High Court CWJC No.7311 of 2021 dt.18-01-2022 2/3 We find the present petition to be totally misconceived in view of disputed questions of fact. That apart, we find the petitioner to have already taken recourse to an equally efficacious remedy available under the provisions of the Consumer Protection Act. Complaint Case No. 02/2017 already stands initiated before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Gaya.

At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the respondents are not co-operating in the

Patna High Court CWJC No.7311 of 2021 dt.18-01-2022 3/3 proceeding pending before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Gaya.

Shri Sanjiv Kumar, learned counsel for the respondents seriously disputes such fact, but assures the Court that his clients shall fully co-operate and not take any unnecessary adjournment. In fact assist the Forum in expeditious disposal of the complaint in accordance with law. As such, present petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

Interlocutory application, if any, shall also stand disposed of.

(Sanjay Karol, CJ) ( S. Kumar, J) Sujit/- AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date 22.01.2022 Transmission Date