Janardan Sao @ Chanardhan Sao v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17496 of 2016 ====================================================== Janardan Sao @ Chanardhan Sao s/o late Ganaurri Sao resident of villageSinduriya, P.S.- Barun, Circle- Barun and District- Aurangabad ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

The District Magistrate , Aurangabad 3.

The Additional Collector Land Reform, Cum Arbitrator , Aurangabad. 4.

The Deputy Collector Land Reform , cum the competent authority, Aurangabad 5.

The Chief General Manager National High Way II, Aurangabad. 6.

The Project Director, P.I.U., N.H.A.I., Varanasi ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anirudh Kumar Verma, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Rishi Raj Sinha-Sc19 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 04-08-2025 Heard Mr. Anirudh Kumar Verma, learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief/s:

(i) for quashing the awarded dated 12.3.2016 passed under "Right to Fair compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 which is amended award dated 7.7.2014 under section 3G of the National Highway Act, 1956 under Gazette

Patna High Court CWJC No.17496 of 2016(2) dt.04-08-2025 2/2 notification dated 8.12.2010 without following mandatory requirements under section 24(2) of the RFCTLARR Act, 2013.

3. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he shall be approaching the competent authority for redressal of the grievance.

4. Learned State counsel has no objection.

5. Granting said liberty, the writ petition is disposed of.

(Rajiv Roy, J) Ravi/- U