← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./14686/2025bail rejected

Mukesh Yadav @ Mukesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-02-28Mr. Justice Jitendra Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14686 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-161 Year-2022 Thana- PHULWARIA District- Begusarai ====================================================== Mukesh Yadav @ Mukesh Kumar S/O Late Bhairo Yadav @ Rambriksh Yadav R/O Barauni- 2, Ward No. 8, P.S.- Teghra, District- Begusarai ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Uma Shankar, Advocate Mr. Prem Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Choubey Jawahar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 28-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sessions Trial No. 111 of 2024 arising out of Phulwaria P.S. Case No.161 of 2022 dated 22.09.2022, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 120(B), 302 and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Earlier the present petitioner has preferred Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 10255 of 2024 for his enlargement on regular bail. However, the same was rejected on merit vide order dated 17.05.2024, on the ground that not only charge-sheet has been submitted but even charge has been framed and the trial is proceeding at snail's pace and therefore, learned Trial Court may be directed to expedite the trial.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14686 of 2025(2) dt.28-02-2025 2/2

4. However, learned APP for the state vehemently opposes the prayer of the petitioner for bail.

5. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the present petition is dismissed in view of the serious nature of the allegation.

6. However, learned Trial Court is requested to expedite the trial, and if the trial is not concluded within six months, the petitioner would be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail.

(Jitendra Kumar, J.) S.Ali/- U T