← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/17944/2016disposed

Bibha Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2024-05-13Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17944 of 2016 ====================================================== Bibha Kumari W/o Arun Kumar Gupta, Resident of Village- Kamtaoul, P.O.P.S. Kamtaul, Block- Jale, District- Darbhanga. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar and Ors 2.

The District Magistrate, Madhubani.

3.

The District Teacher Employment Appellate Authority, Madhubani. 4.

The District Education Officer, Madhubani.

5.

The District Programme Officer Establishment, Madhubani. 6.

The Block Development Officer, Block- Bisfi, District- Madhubani. 7.

The Block Education Officer, Block- Bisfi, District- Madhubani. 8.

The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj Jagvan West, Block- Bisfi, District- Madhubani.

9.

The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj Jagvan West, Block- Bisfi, DistrictMadhubani. 10.

Hema Devi, W/o Prahalad Kumar Das, Primary School, Kamlaban, P.O. Jogvan West, Via- Kamtaul, P.S.- Kamtaul, Block- Bisfi, DistrictMadhubani. 11.

Rekha Kumari, D/o Bijay Kishore Yadav, Rajkiya Primary School, Jogvan West, P.O. Jogvan West, Via- Kamtaul, Block- Bisfi, District- Madhubani. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajeev Kumar Singh For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Ashutosh Ranjan Pandey- Aag15 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 13-05-2024

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties concerned.

2. The petitioner, being aggrieved by order dated 20.07.2016, passed by Presiding Officer, District Teachers Appellate Authority, Madhubani whereby appeal filed by the petitioner against order of her termination from the post of Panchayat Teacher dated 28.011.2007, has been

Patna High Court CWJC No.17944 of 2016(2) dt.13-05-2024 2/2 dismissed, directly approached this Court, without approaching the State Appellate Authority.

3. In view of the nature of dispute, the petitioner is granted liberty to approach the State Appellate Authority, by filing an appeal, against the order passed by Presiding Officer, District Appellate Authority, Madhubani.

4. It is made clear that if an appeal is filed by the petitioner within a period of four weeks from today, along with a petition for condonation of delay, the State Appellate Authority shall consider the same and pass a reasoned order, in accordance with law.

5. With the aforesaid observations and directions, the writ application is disposed.

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J) HarshPandey/- U