Rohit Pal v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.2529 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -72 Year- 2017 Thana -JADOPUR District- GOPALGANJ ======================================================

1. Rohit Pal, S/o Daresh Pal, R/o Village- Bagaha, P.S.- Jadopur, DistrictGopalganj. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anirudh Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Renuka Ratnakar, APP Mr. Lokesh Kumar Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 4/ 27-02-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State as well as counsel for the informant. Petitioner apprehends his arrest in Jadopur P.S. Case No.72 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 341, 323, 324, 325, 307, 504, 302 Indian Penal Code. It is alleged in the written report that this petitioner with other accused persons assaulted the family members of the informant.

There is specific allegation in the written report of assault against Ravi Pal, Ramji Pal and Nainpati Devi. In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today in connection with Jadopur P.S. Case

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2529 of 2018 (4) dt.27-02-2018 2/2 No.72 of 2017, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate, 1st class, Gopalganj, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P. C. with further conditions:

(1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be liable to cancel his bail bond and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Sanjay Priya, J) JA/- U T