Babloo Yadav @ Indradeo Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.919 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -146 Year- 2014 Thana -NAGARNAUSA District- NALANDA (BIHARSHARIFF) ======================================================

1. Babloo Yadav @ Indradeo Yadav Son of Ramanand Yadav Resident of Village-Ariyawan,P.S-Nagarnausa,District-Nalanda .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sunil Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ambika Bhagat, Spl.P. P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 12-01-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Section 341, 323, 427, 379 of the Indian Penal Code and 3(i)(x) of the SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. Considering the nature of allegations and the counter version and the Petitioner has fair antecedents with regard to the present nature of offence, let the petitioner above named be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of this order in connection with Nagarnausa P.S. case No.146 of 2014 (G.R. No.2130 of 2014) on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri P.K. Shukla, Judicial

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.919 of 2015 (2) dt.12-01-2015 2/2 Magistrate, 1st class, Hilsa, Nalanda, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure as also conditions (i) That one of the bailor will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in address of the petitioner.

(ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on ground of misuse, (iii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, (iv) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled.

(Anjana Prakash, J) Narendra/- U T