Patna High CourtCWJC/8367/2014dismissed

Sindhu Devi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-09-07Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8367 of 2014 ====================================================== Sindhu Devi @ Sindhu Kumari wife of Manoj Kumar resident of village - Chakroja Samuddin, Police Station - Mehsi, District - East Champaran. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Commissioner, Tirhut Division at Muzaffarpur.

3. The Collector-cum-District Magistrate, East Champaran at Motihari.

4. The Deputy Director of Welfare, Tirhur Division , Muzaffarpur.

5. The District Planning Officer, Mehasi, East Champaran.

6. The Child Development Project Officer, Mehasi, District - East Champaran.

7. The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj Bakhari Nazir, Mehasi, East Champaran.

8. Asha Devi wife of Rameshwar Thakur resident of village Chakroja Samsuddin, Police Station - Mehasi, District East Champaran. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Singh, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Samir Kumar, AC to SC16 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL ORDER 07-09-2016 Engagement of Anganwari Sevika is not a permanent appointment under the State but is hiring on contract. If the two authorities down below have not found the things in order in the manner in which selection of the petitioner was done and that led to interference, this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India would only opine that the Court has to prima facie satisfy itself that the petitioner was given adequate opportunity to place his or her case and there has been consideration. The observation of the authority rests upon the observation of the High Court, which cannot be said to be misplaced in the given facts and the

Patna High Court CWJC No.8367 of 2014 (2) dt.07-09-2016 nature of engagement.

Writ has no merit. It is dismissed.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) Surendra/- U