Chotu Singh @ Chhotu Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12568 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-611 Year-2018 Thana- KHAJANCHI HAT District- Purnia ====================================================== CHOTU SINGH @ CHHOTU SINGH, Male, aged about 22 years, Son of Sugriv Singh, Resident of Mohalla-Abdulla Nagar, Kalighat, Police StationSadar, District-Purnea ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
Mr. Sudhanshu Shekhar, Adv.
For the Opposite Party :
Mr. Ajay Kumar I, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL ORAL ORDER 01-03-2019 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the State.
The petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 31.08.2018 in connection with S. Tr. No. 8 of 2019/CIS No. 8 of 2019 arising out of K. Hat (Sahayak) P.S. Case No. 611 of 2018 for the offences alleged under Sections 356, 379, 411, 413 and 414 of the Indian Penal Code.
The prosecution case, as lodged by the informant, is that while he was on a motorcycle and received a call from one of his friend, he stopped his motorcycle, started talking and all of a sudden two persons riding on a motorcycle snatched his mobile, but, fell down and were apprehended, including the petitioner, and from their possession three mobiles and a motorcycle without registration number were recovered. Accordingly, a seizure list were prepared.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12568 of 2019(2) dt.01-03-2019 2/2 It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that he is innocent, bears no criminal history and has been sufficiently punished. He, further, submits that the coaccused, who was apprehended along with the petitioner has since been granted the privilege of bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 8235 of 2019, dated 13.02.2019. However, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the facts and circumstances and the materials on record, let the petitioner, above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with S. Tr. No. 8 of 2019/CIS No. 8 of 2019 arising out of K. Hat (Sahayak) P.S. Case No. 611 of 2018 to the satisfaction of the learned Sessions Judge, Purnea. (Nilu Agrawal, J) Shamshad/- U T