Kapildeo Manjhi @ Kapil Manjhi And ANR v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.1992 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -336 Year- 2013 Thana -BIRAUL District- DARBHANGA ======================================================
1. Kapildeo Manjhi @ Kapil Manjhi, son of Kushe Manjhi
2. Anrodhiya Devi, W/o Kapildeo Manjhi @ Kapil Manjhi residents of Village - Itwa Shivnagar, Tole - Barahi, P.S. - Biraul, District - Darbhanga.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjit Kumar Yadav, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Parmanand Prasad (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 19-01-2015 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and the State.
The Petitioners seek anticipatory bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 363, 365 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Considering the background facts of the case, let the Petitioners in the event of surrender, named above, within four weeks from the date of receipt of this order, in connection with Biraul P.S. Case No. 336 of 2013, shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the Court concerned to the satisfaction of Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Biraul at Benipur (Darbhanga), subject to the following conditions: (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.1992 of 2015 (2) dt.19-01-2015 2/2 genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioners. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioners are not accused in any other case and if they are, they shall not be released on bail. (iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioners are implicated in any other case of similar nature after their release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse.
(iv) That the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delay the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (v) That the petitioners will be well represented on each date and if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled.
(Anjana Prakash, J) S.Ali/- U T