Raushan Kumar Sahni v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14605 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-144 Year-2024 Thana- TAJPUR District- Samastipur ====================================================== Raushan Kumar Sahni, Son of Chandeshwar Sahni, Resident of VillageMirzapur, P.S. -Tajpur District- Samastipur ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Rinku Devi, Wife of Kamlesh Sahni, Resident of Village- Mirzapur, P.S. -Tajpur District- Samastipur ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dilip Kumar Roy, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 21-04-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Tajpur P.S. Case No. 144 of 2024 instituted for the offence under Sections 376, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The case of the prosecution based on a complaint petition is that while complainant was alone at her home, the petitioner entered in her house and committed rape on gun point.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that according to the complaint petition the occurrence is of 14.02.2024 whereas the complaint petition has been filed on 14.03.2024, i.e. after one month. It has also

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14605 of 2025(2) dt.21-04-2025 2/2 been submitted that there is no medical examination. Learned counsel further submits that the real fact is that the husband of the informant and father-in-law took one lakh loan from the petitioner on interest. When the petitioner demanded the same, this case has been filed with the help of legal brain. The petitioner is having no criminal antecedent.

5. In contra, learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of bail of the petitioner.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Tajpur P.S. Case No. 144 of 2024, he will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate- 1st Class, Samastipur subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) durgesh/- U T