Sanjay Roy v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.25033 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -102 Year- 2017 Thana -HAJIPUR SADAR DistrictVAISHALI(HAJIPUR) ======================================================
1. Sanjay Roy, Son of Baskit Roy, Resident of Village- Madanpur, P.S. Sadar, District- Vaishali.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Surendra Kishore Thakur For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Nawal Kishore Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 05-07-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Sadar P.S. Case No. 102 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 448, 341, 323, 325, 307 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Allegation against the petitioner is of firing on the informant.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that as a matter of fact a title suit is going between the parties and only to put pressure on him, he has filed the present case and though there is allegation of firing against the petitioner, however, nobody got injured from the said firing, which will appear from the F.I.R itself. Further petitioner has been in custody since 18.04.2017. Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, let
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.25033 of 2017 (3) dt.05-07-2017 2/2 the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur, in connection with Sadar P.S. Case No. 102 of 2017, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.
(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T