Bipin Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24217 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-412 Year-2020 Thana- GORAUL District- Vaishali ====================================================== 1.

BIPIN RAM SON OF FUDAN RAM R/O VILLAGE- SHEKHPURA GANGTI, P.S.- GORAUL, DIST.- VAISHALI AT HAJIPUR 2.

VIKASH RAM @ VIKASH KUMAR SON OF BIPIN RAM R/O VILLAGE- SHEKHPURA GANGTI, P.S.- GORAUL, DIST.- VAISHALI AT HAJIPUR 3.

VIVEK KUMAR @ BABUA @ BABUA RAM SON OF BIPIN RAM R/O VILLAGE- SHEKHPURA GANGTI, P.S.- GORAUL, DIST.- VAISHALI AT HAJIPUR 4.

REKHA DEVI WIFE OF BIPIN RAM R/O VILLAGE- SHEKHPURA GANGTI, P.S.- GORAUL, DIST.- VAISHALI AT HAJIPUR ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Niranjan Parihar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. APP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 18-01-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is expected to honour his undertaking given in the instant case for depositing the requisite court fee and to remove the defect(s) as pointed out by the office when called upon to do so by the office. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 325, 307, 379, 354(B) and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is a case of assault upon the informant and her

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24217 of 2021(2) dt.18-01-2022 2/2 family members by the accused persons.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that there is no specific allegation of assault by the informant. He further submits that specific allegation of assault is against co-accused Lalit Paswan and Ajay Paswan and not against these petitioners. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners.

Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners, above named in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM, Vaishali at Hajipur, in connection with Goraul (Katahra O.P.) P.S. Case No. 412 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) brajesh kumar/- U T