Anjani Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.181 of 2017 =========================================================== Anjani Kumari, W/o Sri Sappan Kumar Singh, R/o Village + P.O. - Tihiya, P.S.- Khaira, District-Jamui .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, patna

2. The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of BIhar, patna

3. The Director, Primary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna

4. The District Teacher Employment Appellate Authority, Jamui, District-Jamui through its Chairman.

5. The District Magistrate, Jamui, District-Jamui

6. The District Education Officer, Jamui, District-Jamui

7. The District Programme Officer, (Establishment), Jamui, District-Jamui

8. The Block Development Officer, Jamui, District -Jamui

9. The Block Education Officer, Jamui District Jamui

10. The Panchyayat Sevak Cum-Secretary, Panchayat Teacher Employment Unit Gram Panchayat Raj-Kakan, Block-Jamui, District-Jamui

11. The Mukhiya Cum-Chairman, Panchayat Teacher Employment Unit, Gram Panchayat Raj-Kakan, Block-Jamui, District-Jamui .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mrityunjay Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Shankar Kumar Thakur, AC to GP-27 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 27-02-2017 As prayed, the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction with respect to the description of respondent no.4 in course of the day.

Heard parties.

The petitioner's case is that despite the direction given by the appellate authority to the Employment Unit of Gram Panchayat Raj, Kakan, Block-Jamui, District- Jamui vide Annexure-10 for considering the case of the petitioner, nothing has been done. In view of the fact that vide Rule 15 of the Bihar State

Patna High Court CWJC No.181 of 2017 dt.27-02-2017 2/2 School Teachers and Employees Grievance Redressal Rules, 2015, power has already been granted to the appellate authority to punish the persons or officials, who are not carrying out its direction and the petitioner has already moved before the appellate authority for the said purpose, this writ application stands disposed of, without going into the merit of the case, with a direction to the respondent no.4 to proceed under the aforesaid rule, if its order has not been modified, altered or set aside by any competent forum or authority. If the petitioner approaches the appellate authority along with a copy of this order, let the matter be disposed of expeditiously by taking appropriate action in accordance with law.

It is further made clear that if nothing is done within a reasonable period then the petitioner would be at liberty to approach this Court once again.

(Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J) V.K. Pandey/- AFR/NAFR N.A.F.R.

CAV DATE N.A.

Uploading Date 01.03.2017 Transmission Date N.A.