← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./13540/2022dismissed

Jakesh Kumar @ Rakesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2022-08-04Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13540 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-256 Year-2021 Thana- ARARIA District- Araria ====================================================== JAKESH KUMAR @ RAKESH KUMAR S/o Late Sanni Bahardar Resident of Village- Baghela Tola, Panchayat Diyari, P.S.- Araria, District- Araria. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Nafisuzzoha, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs. Indu Kumari Srivastava, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 04-08-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects within four weeks of resumption of normal court proceedings. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within stipulated period, office will place the matter before the Bench. The petitioner apprehend his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 366A/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegedly, the petitioner along with others kidnapped the minor daughter of the informant on giving inducement for solemnizing marriage.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. He

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13540 of 2022(2) dt.04-08-2022 2/2 has been falsely implicated in this case due to dirty village politics. No such occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. The allegation leveled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. The alleged victim girl in her statement recorded in section 164 Cr.P.C. stated that she left her house on her own and she solemnized her marriage with the petitioner on her free will. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent, which is also mentioned in para-3 of the bail application.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, since the victim is a minor, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The prayer for grant of anticipatory bail on his behalf is hereby rejected.

This application is accordingly, dismissed.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) shikha/- U T