← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/4809/2020disposed

Santosh Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2022-12-19Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4809 of 2020 ====================================================== Santosh Kumar Singh Son of Sarjun Singh Resident of Village- Basudeva, Police Station- Nawa Nagar, District- Buxar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar Bihar.

2.

The District Magistrate Buxar.

3.

The Additional Collector Buxar.

4.

The Sub Divisional Public Grievance Redressal Officer Dumraon, Buxar. 5.

The Circle Officer Navanagar, District- Buxar. 6.

The Block Development Officer Navanagar, District- Buxar. 7.

The Mukhiya of Atimi Gram Panchayat District- Buxar. 8.

Smt. Vinita Devi Wife of Lakhendra Chaurasia Ward Member of Ward No. 02, Village- Basudeva, Police Station- Navanagar, District- Buxar. 9.

Lakhendra Chaurasia Son of Late Ram Ashish Chaurasia The Contractor of Village- Basudeva, Police Station- Navanagar, District- Buxar. 10.

The Hans Nath Singh Son of Late Singhasan Singh Resident of VillageBasudeva, Police Station- Navanagar, District- Buxar. 11.

Raja Singh Son of Late Butan Singh Resident of Village- Basudeva, Police Station- Navanagar, District- Buxar.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Devi Das Srivastava For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Raj Kishore Roy (Gp18) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 19-12-2022 In pursuance to the order dated 5.12.2022, the District Magistrate, Buxar, has filed a supplementary counter affidavit, wherein it has been stated that the land in question has been measured by a team of two independent Amins, in presence of the petitioner and it has been found

Patna High Court CWJC No.4809 of 2020(5) dt.19-12-2022 2/2 that no portion of the pathway in question is existing / situated over the raiyati land of the petitioner.

In view of the aforesaid, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to seek redressal of his subsisting grievances, if any, by taking recourse to such remedies as are otherwise available under the law. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of as not pressed.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Ajay/SonalU