Vikas Construction And Co. v. The Bihar Rajya Pul Nirman Nigam Ltd And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.885 of 2015 =========================================================== Vikas Construction & Co. through its partner Mr. Vikash Kumar son of Late Saryug Prasad Resides at Mohalla: - Gola Road, P.S: - Rupaspur, P.O:- Danapur. District: - Patna. Pin- 801503; Office situated at Mohalla: - Nehru Nagar, Patliputra, 1st Floor. "Saryug Complex" P.S+P.S:- Patliputra, Patna-23. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The Bihar Rajya Pul Nirman Nigam Ltd. (A Certified Company of State of Bihar) through its Chairman, 7, Sardar Patel Marg, Patna-15.
2. The Managing Director, Bihar Rajya Pul Nirman Nigam Ltd. (A Certified Company of State of Bihar) through its Chairman, 7, Sardar Patel Marg, Patna-15.
3. The Dy. Chief Engineer, (South Bihar Anchal) Bihar Rajya Pul Nirman Nigam Ltd. (A Certified Company of State of Bihar) through its Chairman, 7, Sardar Patel Marg, Patna-15.
4. The Sr. Project Engineer, Bihar Rajya Pul Nirman Nigam Ltd, Works Division, Nalanda. Office situated at Shiv Kunj, Kagazi Mohalla, Biharsharif (Nalanda) 803101.
5. The Project Engineer, Bihar Rajya Pul Nirman Nigam Ltd, Works Sub-Division, Nawada.
.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
For the Respondent/s :
=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 19-01-2016 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the nature of controversy involved, he may be permitted to withdraw the present writ petition to enable him to move
Patna High Court CWJC No.885 of 2015 dt.19-01-2016 2/2 before the Bihar Public Works Contract Disputes Arbitration Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the 'Tribunal').
Learned counsel for the State does not oppose. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed off with the aforesaid liberty.
It goes without saying that before the Tribunal, the petitioner shall be free to raise all issues raised in the present writ petition which shall be considered in accordance with law after giving adequate opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned. (Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J) Sujit/- U