Moti Lal Sah And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.1166 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -172 Year- 2014 Thana -HARSIDHI DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ======================================================

1. Moti Lal Sah son of Late Sunar Sah,

2. Tara Devi wife of Moti Lal Sah, Both R/o Village- Ghiuwadhar, P.S.- Harsidhi, District- East Champaran .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dhurendra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. C.Jawahar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 16-01-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 498A, 304B, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 3⁄4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

Considering that the Petitioners are the parents-in-law of the deceased and there is no direct material against them, let the petitioners above named be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of this order in connection with Harsidhi P.S. case No.172 of 2014 (G.R. case No.2347 of 2014) on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.5,000/- (five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.1166 of 2015 (2) dt.16-01-2015 2/2 satisfaction of Smt. Sangeeta Rani, Judicial Magistrate, 1st class, Sadar at Motihari, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure as also conditions (i) That one of the bailor will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in address of the petitioners, (ii) That the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delay the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, (iii) That the petitioners will be well represented on each date if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled.

(Anjana Prakash, J) Narendra/- U T