Syed Khalid @ Khalid Anjum v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15774 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-233 Year-2024 Thana- AMAS District- Gaya ====================================================== Syed Khalid @ Khalid Anjum S/o- Late Akbar Imam Village- Shahbajpur, Police Station- Shakurabad, District- Jehanabad ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Raj Krishna Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Madhura Nand Jha For the Informant :

Mr. Apurv Harsh Mr. Raghu Raj Pratap Ms. Jaya Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 24-04-2026 Heard the parties including the learned counsel for the informant.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Amas P.S. Case No. 233 of 2024 registered for the offence under Sections 111, 109, 61(2), 3(5) of the BNS, 2023 and under Sections 25(1-b)a, 26, 35, 27 of the Arms Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, one Photo Khan, who is having 20 criminal antecedents, has been shot by the accused persons in Court campus.

4. The petitioner is in custody since 11.12.2025.

5. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is innocent and he has falsely

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15774 of 2026(2) dt.24-04-2026 2/3 been implicated in this case. He further submits that the petitioner was not named in the FIR and Photo Khan has taken his name who has been examined for the first time by the police after four months of the alleged occurrence. He next submits that naming of the petitioner after four months creates doubt in the involvement of the petitioner in the crime and there is no allegation against the petitioner.

6. Learned counsel for the State and the Informant have opposed the application of the petitioner.

7. I have heard and considered the submission of the parties.

8. Considering the aforesaid facts, this application is allowed.

9. Let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned concerned Court below in connection with Amas P.S. Case No. 233 of 2024.

10. As a condition of this order, the petitioner after being released on bail is directed to mark his attendance at Shakurabad Police Station on first and third Sunday of each month. Any default in appearance at the police station will result

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15774 of 2026(2) dt.24-04-2026 3/3 in cancellation of bail bonds of the petitioner.

11. As a condition of this order, the petitioner, after being released on bail, is directed to co-operate in the trial either by appearing personally or through his lawyer in the trial Court on each and every date fixed by the trial Court. Non-compliance of the condition will result in cancellation of the bail bonds of the petitioner.

12. It is, however, clarified that the observations made herein are limited to the adjudication of the present bail application and shall not prejudice the case of the petitioner at any subsequent stage of the trial and this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. (Sandeep Kumar, J) Vikas/- U