← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./13258/2025allowed

Subham Kumar @ Namo Narayan v. The State Of Bihar

2025-02-28Mr. Justice Ashok Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13258 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-80 Year-2024 Thana- Shahpur P.S. District- Nawada ====================================================== Subham Kumar @ Namo Narayan, Son of Late Mukesh Kumar @ Late Mukesh Singh @ Kharho Singh, Resident of Vill- Rewara, P.S.- Shahpur, District- Nawada ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dhananjay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ram Sevak Choudhary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 28-02-2025 Heard Mr. Dhananjay Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Ram Sevak Choudhary, learned APP for the State.

2. The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Shahpur P.S. Case No. 80 of 2024 instituted for the offence under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 317(5) and 61(B) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023 and under Section 66(B), 66(C) and 66(D) of the Information Technology Act.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the police received information that in orchad of Daya Singh altogether 10 persons are sitting and they are planning to cheat innocent persons. To verify the information the informant constituted a raiding party and reached to the place of the occurrence where three persons were apprehended. The villagers disclosed the name of this petitioner.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13258 of 2025(2) dt.28-02-2025 2/2 has submitted nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. It is next submitted that there is no complain regarding fraud by anyone.

5. In contra, learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of bail of the petitioner.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Shahpur P.S. Case no. 80 of 2024, he will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate VI, Nawada subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

7. Accordingly, the present bail application stands allowed.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) durgesh/- U T