← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./12913/2026allowed

Nandu Yadav @ Nandu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2026-02-26Mr. Justice Sunil Dutta Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12913 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-154 Year-2025 Thana- ALIPUR District- Gaya ====================================================== Nandu Yadav @ Nandu Kumar S/O Nathun Yadav Resident of VillageAkhanpur, P.S.- Alipur, District- Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Surendra Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sharda Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 26-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

3. As per the prosecution case, informant raised suspicion that this petitioner along with other co-accused persons and some unknown persons killed his brother, namely, Dhananjay Kumar, whose deadbody was found in Rasalpur canal near cremation house along with his motorcycle bearing Reg. No. BR02-Z-3493.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case merely on suspicion. Further submission is that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12913 of 2026(2) dt.26-02-2026 2/2 nothing incriminating material has been recovered form the conscious possession of the petitioner. There is no eye witness to support the prosecution case. The charge-sheet has already been submitted after completion of investigation. Petitioner is in custody since 03.11.2025 having no criminal antecedent and he undertakes to co-operate in the trial. There is no chance of tampering with the evidence or absconding of the petitioner.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the bail application of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the fact that charge-sheet has been submitted, clean antecedent of the petitioner and period of custody undergone, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-VI, Gaya Ji/concerned Court in connection with Alipur P.S. Case No. 154 of 2025.

(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) utkarsh/- U T