Kashi Nath Singh And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5018 of 2016 ====================================================== 1.
Kashi Nath Singh, Son of Late Sugreev Singh, resident of Mohalla P.O. Dalsagar, P.S. Buxar I , District - Buxar 2.
Lallan Prasad Singh, Son of Late Sugreev Singh, resident of Mohalla P.O. Dalsagar, P.S. Buxar I , District - Buxar 3.
Dadan Prasad, Son of SRi Hiralal, Resident of Mohalla P.O. Kharatade, P.S. Semari, District - Buxar, Presently Posted at Sub - Division "Dumaron" District - Buxar 4.
Nav Ratan Prasad, Son of Late Natun Prasad resident of Mohalla - Tateree Bazar, Dumaron, P.O. P.S. Dumaron, District - Buxar, Presently Posted at Uchha Vidyala "Chakki" District - Buxar ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State Of Bihar 2.
The Divisional Commissioner, Patna 3.
The Disttrict Magistrate, Buxar 4.
The Deputy Collector, Establishment, Buxar 5.
The Sub - Divisional officer, Dumaron, Buxar 6.
The Circle officer, Chakee, Buxar 7.
The Block Development officer, Semari, Buxar 8.
The Head Master, Uchha Vidyla, Chakee, Buxar ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Kritya Nand Jha, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Arbind Kumar No. II, SC-17 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 21-01-2025 Learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State are present.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the present Writ Petition has been filed for a direction to the respondents to pay the arrears of salary to the petitioners from 06.12.1994 to 05.02.1997.
Patna High Court CWJC No.5018 of 2016(4) dt.21-01-2025 2/2
3. Learned counsel for the State submits that in paragraph 18 of the counter affidavit filed on behalf of respondent Nos. 3 to 7 specific stand has been taken that the petitioners have not annexed any representation in support of their pleadings.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that the petitioners may be given an opportunity to file a fresh representation before the respondent No.3, namely, the District Magistrate, Buxar.
5. In view of the aforesaid submissions, petitioners are directed to file a fresh representation before the respondent No.3, namely, the District Magistrate, Buxar within four week from today. Respondent No.3, namely, the District Magistrate, Buxar is directed to pass a reasoned and speaking order on the representation filed by the petitioners within 90 days from the date of its filing along with a copy of this order.
6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the present Writ Petition stands disposed off.
(Dr. Anshuman, J) Ashwini/- U