Patna High CourtCR. MISC./26117/2017dismissed

Binod Thakur @ Bhabhikhan v. The State Of Bihar

2017-06-29Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.26117 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1097 Year- 2016 Thana -SASARAM MUFFSIL District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ======================================================

1. Binod Thakur @ Bhabhikhan, son of Late Sushil Thakur, resident of Village- Dhaudar, Police Station- Sasaram (M), District- Rohtas (Bihar). .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dhaneshwar Prasad Gupta For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Nityanand Tiwary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 29-06-2017 Heard the parties.

This application is for grant of regular bail in connection with Sasaram (Muffasill) P.S.Case No.1097 of 2016 for the offences under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and it appears that his name transpired during the course of investigation of the case. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is not named in the F.I.R. and nothing has been recovered, though he is accused in one more case but he is on bail in that case, further he is in custody since 2.4.2017.

Heard learned A.P.P. also, who has opposed the prayer for bail stating that the materials have come during the course of investigation that the petitioner was involved in selling the stolen

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.26117 of 2017 (3) dt.29-06-2017 2/2 vehicle to other accused persons.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage, however, the learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial of the petitioner and try to conclude it within a period of six months and if not concluded, the petitioner is at liberty to renew his prayer for bail.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is dismissed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U