Patna High CourtCR. MISC./13666/2026allowed

Md. Sabir v. The State Of Bihar

2026-03-12Mr. Justice Ashok Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13666 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-179 Year-2025 Thana- TAJPUR District- Samastipur ====================================================== Md. Sabir Son of Md. Mustafa Resident of Village- Kasbe Ahar, P.S.- Tajpur, District- Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Lakshmindra Kumar Yadav, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Humayou Ahmad Khan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 12-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 331 (4) and 305 of the BNS.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that unknown miscreants committed theft in the house of the informant and took away Rs. 60,000/- in cash, jewellery worth Rs. 12 lakhs and other articles worth Rs. 3 lakhs.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in connection with the present case. It is further submitted that since the petitioner has criminal antecedents of two cases, he was apprehended by the police and the petitioner has also made

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13666 of 2026(2) dt.12-03-2026 2/2 a confessional statement. It has further been submitted that one 'payal' has been recovered from the possession of this petitioner, which allegedly belongs to the informant. It has further been submitted that no T.I. Parade of the recovered article has been conducted. Save and except the confessional statement and recovery of one 'payal', there is nothing against the petitioner. The petitioner is in custody since 08.10.2025.

5. Learned APP appearing for the state has opposed the prayer of regular bail.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Tajpur P.S. Case No. 179 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM-1st, Samastipur.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Jagdish/- U T