Patna High CourtCR. MISC./27118/2017bail granted

Umesh Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar

2017-07-18Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.27118 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -23 Year- 2017 Thana -BADHAILA District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ======================================================

1. Umesh Chaudhary, S/o Late Rajbali Chaudhary, Resident of Village Charpurva, P.S.- Sanjhauli, Distt.- Rohtas.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Chhote Lal Mishra For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Ram Priya Saran Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 18-07-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Baghaila P.S. Case No. 23 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 25(1b)a, 26/35 of the Arms Act. Allegation is of recovery of pistol and cartridges. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that from perusal of the F.I.R itself, it will appear that nothing has been recovered from the petitioner rather the same was recovered from the co-accused of this case. Further petitioner has no criminal antecedent and has been in judicial custody since 16.04.2017. Learned counsel for the State could not controvert the above facts.

Having heard both sides, in view of the facts as stated above, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.27118 of 2017 (3) dt.18-07-2017 2/2 furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM, Rohtas (Sasaram), in connection with Baghaila P.S. Case No. 23 of 2017, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T