Raju Kumar Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21781 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1 Year-2015 Thana- MUZAFFARPUR TOWN DistrictMuzaffarpur ====================================================== Raju Kumar Chaudhary, Son of Dinesh Prasad Chaudhary, Resident of Village - Ahiyapur, P.O.- Bariyarpur, P.S.- Piyar, District - Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjay Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Nawal Kishore Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 08-04-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code.

The prosecution case, as per the written report of Ranjeet Kumar Shukla, Assistant General Manager, State Bank of India submitted to the Station House Officer of Muzaffarpur Police Station, is to the effect that the petitioner was posted as Customer Assistant in State Bank of India, Muzaffarpur Branch. The applications for selection process for appointment on the various posts by Staff Selection Commission was to be received

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21781 of 2019(2) dt.08-04-2019 2/3 by the State Bank of India and the State Bank of India used to charge service fee. The petitioner collected Rs. 34,115/- but did not deposit in the account.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that for the same charge, the petitioner was being removed from the service and the same was challenged in CWJC No. 6019 of 2016 and a Bench of this Court vide order dated 10.05.2018 quashed the punishment order and directed for reinstatement of the petitioner. However, the petitioner is ready to deposit the alleged amount of Rs.34,115/- before the learned Court below. Learned APP submits that there is specific accusation against the petitioner.

Considering the present stand of the petitioner, the fact that for the same charge the petitioner was punished and the punishment order has already been quashed, let the above named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail, on deposit of Rs.34,115/- which will be result of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur in connection with Muzaffarpur Town P.S. Case

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21781 of 2019(2) dt.08-04-2019 3/3 No. 01 of 2015, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) DKS/- U T