Pramila Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15397 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-388 Year-2023 Thana- KATORIYA District- Banka ====================================================== 1.

Pramila Devi, W/O Bharat Yadav, R/O Village- Sathiyari, P.S- Katoriya, Distt.- Banka.

2.

Bharat Yadav, S/O Late Bhuto Yadav, R/O Village- Sathiyari, P.S- Katoriya, Distt.- Banka.

3.

Uma Shankar Yadav, S/O Bharat Yadav, R/O Village- Sathiyari, P.SKatoriya, Distt.- Banka. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Om Prakash Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Vinod Shanker Modi, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 21-04-2025 Heard Mr. Om Prakash Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Vinod Shanker Modi, learned APP for the State.

2.The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with Katoriya P.S. Case No.388 of 2023 instituted for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 379, 308 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners who are in-laws of the informant have assaulted her and her husband. It is further alleged that a mobile was also being

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15397 of 2025(2) dt.21-04-2025 2/3 snatched by the petitioners.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners has submitted that petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. They have falsely been implicated in this case. It has further been submitted that the victims of this case have received simple injury. This case has been filed by the daughter-in-law against all in-laws. The actual dispute is that of partition. Petitioners are in-laws. Petitioner no. 1 is having no criminal antecedent and petitioner nos. 2 and 3 are having one criminal antecedent.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of bail of the petitioners.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrender in connection with Katoriya P.S. Case No. 388 of 2023, they will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate at Banka, subject to the conditions as laid down

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15397 of 2025(2) dt.21-04-2025 3/3 under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T