Nasima Khatoon v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15420 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-165 Year-2018 Thana- BHAGWANPUR District- Vaishali ====================================================== Nasima Khatoon, Female, aged about 38 years, Wife of Md. Ainur Khan @ Md. Anul R/o village- Prataptand (West), P.S- Bhagwanpur, District- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Nityanand For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Pushpa Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 13-03-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

In this case, the petitioner is apprehending her arrest in connection with Bhagwanpur P.S. Case No. 165 of 2018 registered for offences under sections 363, 366(A) of the Indian Penal Code.

In the present case, an allegation has been made that Sabre Alam, Ainur Khan and the mother of Sabre Alam, the petitioner, entered into the house of the Informant and took away his daughter, Pinky Kumari on the point of arms. The accused persons also took away with them cash amounting Rs. 25,000/-.

From the records, it appears that the specific allegation has been made against Sabre Alam of committing

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15420 of 2019(2) dt.13-03-2019 2/2 rape on the victim girl by administering her sedatives. Looking to the entire facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of her arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali, Hajipur in connection with Bhagwanpur P.S. Case No. 165 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. as also subject to condition that whenever the police will call the petitioner for investigation/interrogation, she will remain present and if she would not present herself, the privilege of grant of anticipatory bail shall be deemed to have been canceled.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) rishi/- U T