Satish Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25412 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-355 Year-2020 Thana- WAJIRGANJ District- Gaya ====================================================== SATISH KUMAR SON OF LATE SURENDRA SINGH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- BUDHOAUL, P.S.- HISUA, DISTRICT- NAWADA ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Samrendra Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 06-12-2021 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Let the defect(s), if any, be removed within four weeks after complete start of the physical Court. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302 and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

The informant is not an eyewitness of the occurrence. Suspicion is only material against the petitioner. The impugned order also reveals that petitioner is prime suspect in the case. Suspicion cannot take the place of the proof. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. Hence, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25412 of 2021(2) dt.06-12-2021 2/2 released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (rupees twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending in connection with Wazirganj Police Station Case No. 355 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure as well as subject to the following conditions:- (a) The petitioner shall fully cooperate with the investigation/trial of the case, failing which the learned court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner. (b) Both the bailors shall be resident of territorial jurisdiction of the learned court below.

(c) The petitioner shall not leave the country without permission of the learned trial court.

(Birendra Kumar, J) Kundan/- U T