Santosh Kumar v. The Union Of India

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5606 of 2020 ====================================================== Santosh Kumar, aged about 26 years (Male) S/o Jitendra Kumar Paswan, R/o Vill- Adalpur, P.S.- Sadar, Dist.- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner

Versus

2.

The Bank of Maharashtra through its Managing Director, Bank of Maharashtra, Central Officer, Lokmangal, 1501, Shivajinagar, Pune-411005 3.

The Regional Manager, Bihar, Bank of Maharashtra, Pandey Plaza, Exhibition Road, Ali Nagar Colony, Salimpur Ahra Golamber, Patna-800001 ... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Pranav Kumar with Mr. Rajeev Ranjan No.II, Advocates For the RespondentBank of Maharashtra :

Mr. Mritunjay Kumar with Ms. Shilpi Singh, Advocates ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 18-08-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondent-Bank of Maharashtra. The parties are in agreement that the petitioner's selection has been kept in abeyance due to pendency of writ petition bearing WP No. 965 of 2021 before the Hon'ble High Court at Bombay.

Since the petitioner's selection pursuant to Part Time Sub-Staff Recruitment 2017 process is pending adjudication in the above noted writ proceedings, the parties are in agreement that this writ petition need not be kept pending as the petitioner's fate would be subject to result of the above noted

Patna High Court CWJC No.5606 of 2020(12) dt.18-08-2022 2/2 writ petition.

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed.

(Madhuresh Prasad, J) shyambihari/- U