Dippu Yadav @ Deepu Yadav @ Dippu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14030 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-190 Year-2024 Thana- YADOPUR District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Dippu Yadav @ Deepu Yadav @ Dippu Kumar Son of Kishan Yadav @ Krishna Yadav @ Krishna Ji Resident of Village- Bhagwanpur PS -Nautan Dist- West Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vikash Kumar Shukla For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Kanhiya Kishor ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 16-04-2026 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has antecedent of ten cases under the Excise Act and allegation is of recovery of 6 litres of liquor from a motorcycle and 270 litres of liquor from a place near a river. 4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was not arrested from the spot as such nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and even the alleged recovery is from a place which does not belong to the petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14030 of 2026(2) dt.16-04-2026 2/2 and is accessible to public at large and petitioner is not the owner of the seized vehicle, and he came to be implicated based on confessional statement of Mantu in police custody which does not have any evidentiary value. It is also submitted that petitioner is in custody since 26-7-2025. It is next submitted that if privilege of regular bail is granted to the petitioner, the petitioner will not abscond rather will co-operate in the trial to prove his innocence.

5.

Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

6.

Considering the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Yadopur P.S. Case No. 190 of 2024.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Sumit/- U T