Rakesh Das v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.29039 of 2017 (2) dt.19-07-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.29039 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -95 Year- 2013 Thana -SONBERSA District- SITAMARHI ====================================================== Rakesh Das Son of Late Dukha Das, Resident of Village- Matiar, P.S.- Sahiyara, District- Sitamarhi.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Virendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Jai Narain Thakur ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 19-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP representing the State.

The petitioner wants to renew his prayer of bail, which was earlier rejected vide order dated 22.06.2016 passed in Cr. Misc. No.15837 of 2016, on the ground that the petitioner is in custody since 26.05.2014, the trial has not been concluded within six months, failing which the petitioner was given liberty to renew his prayer of bail, up-till now only four witnesses have been examined and in near future the trial is not likely to be concluded. Learned APP fairly submits that the petitioner was given liberty to renew his prayer of bail.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.29039 of 2017 (2) dt.19-07-2017 Magistrate, Sitamarhi in connection with Sonbarsa P.S. Case No. 95 of 2013, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T