Sushila Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13754 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-44 Year-2025 Thana- SONO District- Jamui ====================================================== Sushila Kumari W/o Sri Anirudha Kumar @ Anirudh Kumar R/o MohallaNew Jaganpura, P.S.- Ramkrishna Nagar, Town and District- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shiv Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Rina Sinha, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 24-07-2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends her arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) and 61(2) of the BNS.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and in sum and substance, the allegation against the petitioner in the FIR is that she was appointed on the post of GNM based on a later which was subsequently found forged. It is further submitted that petitioner has been removed from the service.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is further submitted that prior to instituting the instant FIR, no explanation from the petitioner was sought. It is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13754 of 2026(2) dt.24-07-2026 2/2 next submitted that had an opportunity been given to the petitioner to explain her side of the case perhaps the instant FIR would not have been instituted.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, let the petitioner, above-named, in the event of her arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Sono P.S. Case No. 44 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C./482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T