Ravi Kumar @ Ravi Raj v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19373 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-36 Year-2023 Thana- BIND District- Nalanda ====================================================== Ravi Kumar @ Ravi Raj Son of Narayan Sharma Resident of VillageNauranga, P.S.- Bind, District- Nalanda ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Sanjeev Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Pranav Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 02-04-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 379, 420 and 406 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. The prosecution case, in brief, is that while the informant had gone to his ancestral village he had given his mobile no.9135334423 for charging to his neighbour Ravi Kumar at 6:45 PM and after charging the said mobile was returned back to the informant at 8:30 PM. On 23.03.2023, while he returned back to Patna and checked his account number then found that through phone-pay Rs.68,000/- illegal transaction was done and credited in the account of Paytm holder Sumit Vikram.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that no such occurrence as alleged ever took place. He has been
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19373 of 2024(2) dt.02-04-2024 2/2 falsely implicated in this case merely on suspicion. It is further submitted that in the present case the money has been transferred in the paytm account of one Sumit Vikaram and not in the account of the petitioner. It is further submitted that Rs.68,000/-, which was received through phone pay by coaccused Sumit Vikram, has already been returned by him to the informant and on this ground he has already been released on bail by the learned Court below. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.
5. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail.
6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Bind P.S. Case No. 36 of 2023, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) Trivedi/- U T